I'm reading Patricia Highsmith's Diaries and Notebooks. What led to this was a rewatch of The Talented Mr. Ripley and, subsequently, Ripley on Netflix. I am not going to watch Purple Noon, or am I? I don't know. Ugh.
I've never read the Ripley books, but I thought, hey, those must be ripe with descriptions of the wealthy and languid European expat life. A good start.
One of my "things" is bored, rich people on vacation. Well, that's Dickie fucking Greenleaf and Marge Sherwood to a tee. No real responsibility to escape from. Chosen passions they're not really good at. An endless stream of rented homes and luxury hotels with servants. Sometimes playacting a more modest life where they have to hit farmers' markets and fill up their own ice trays. How cute.
Completely unattainable, but so easy to observe. I can check train routes, take 3D tours of accommodations, Google Street View it, watch obnoxious vloggers put their grubby hands all over it.
But Patty took it to the next level. Ripley is like a mirror for my own desires and conflicts regarding wealth. I wouldn't really classify it as a crime thriller because I feel that diminishes it.
Like most people, there's a love-hate thing that I have with the rich—fascinated by their lives, envious of their privilege, judgmental of their weaknesses, and simultaneously disgusted by my own inferiority. I see how easily I could slip into his mindset, willing to deceive and compromise just to be part of that wooorld.
The most striking realization is that guilt wouldn’t linger long; I’d feel it, but I’d move past it quickly, drawn by the allure of a life I both crave and resent. I find it all so relatable, ew.
There's also the familiar feeling of loving someone and wanting to be them at the same time. You kind of want to be in their skin. Maybe you're in love with the idea of them or the idea of yourself being with them. It's ironic how wanting to be that close to someone can also be so detached from real love. Well, I don't know. Maybe that's real self-love.
So, I ordered the books. In the meantime, I downloaded her Diaries and Notebooks and fed it to TypeLit.io. Typing it all out is an inefficient way to read, so I do it the regular way save for some passages that I really like. Makes me feel like I'm trying out her words. Unsurprisingly, she was preoccupied with writing, getting published, the quality of her accommodations, money, alcohol, and women. Lots of women. It's quite gay.
And, of course, I found her journals in her 20s tedious and, sometimes, amusing in a patronizing way. I'm deep into her 30s now, and I can recognize myself in her writing—a certain exasperation and social fatigue. She never went long without a girlfriend, though, and I have no idea how I am now as a lover so I can't compare. One thing I did notice is that the way she writes about love is consistent, with a girlishness, full of ultra-specific details only an obsessive youth would hold on to. I find hope in that.
She wasn't entitled, and humbly accepted life's "truths" as she encountered them, which I like. There was nothing stubborn about her except her desire to write and her hatred of Jews? Apparently, she was an anti-Semite, which I don't understand.
She also had a thing for snails. From the NY Times: She kept hundreds of them in her back garden and once brought about a hundred with her to a cocktail party, hidden along
with a large head of lettuce in her handbag, which she delighted in
showing to surprised guests.
Moving from England to France, Highsmith
was prohibited by law from bringing her snails into the country, so she
smuggled them in under her breasts, fitting up to ten under each.
It takes someone real demented to do that.
I rarely ever see snails, but yesterday, when I took Pancho out on our front yard, he almost peed on one!